How childhood maltreatment alters perception and cognition – the predictive processing account of borderline personality disorder


Journal article


P. Herzog, T. Kube, Eva Fassbinder
Psychological Medicine, 2022

Semantic Scholar DOI PubMedCentral PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Herzog, P., Kube, T., & Fassbinder, E. (2022). How childhood maltreatment alters perception and cognition – the predictive processing account of borderline personality disorder. Psychological Medicine.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Herzog, P., T. Kube, and Eva Fassbinder. “How Childhood Maltreatment Alters Perception and Cognition – the Predictive Processing Account of Borderline Personality Disorder.” Psychological Medicine (2022).


MLA   Click to copy
Herzog, P., et al. “How Childhood Maltreatment Alters Perception and Cognition – the Predictive Processing Account of Borderline Personality Disorder.” Psychological Medicine, 2022.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{p2022a,
  title = {How childhood maltreatment alters perception and cognition – the predictive processing account of borderline personality disorder},
  year = {2022},
  journal = {Psychological Medicine},
  author = {Herzog, P. and Kube, T. and Fassbinder, Eva}
}

Abstract

Abstract Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe mental disorder, comprised of heterogeneous psychological and neurobiological pathologies. Here, we propose a predictive processing (PP) account of BPD to integrate these seemingly unrelated pathologies. In particular, we argue that the experience of childhood maltreatment, which is highly prevalent in BPD, leaves a developmental legacy with two facets: first, a coarse-grained, alexithymic model of self and others – leading to a rigidity and inflexibility concerning beliefs about self and others. Second, this developmental legacy leads to a loss of confidence or precision afforded beliefs about the consequences of social behavior. This results in an over reliance on sensory evidence and social feedback, with concomitant lability, impulsivity and hypersensitivity. In terms of PP, people with BPD show a distorted belief updating in response to new information with two opposing manifestations: rapid changes in beliefs and a lack of belief updating despite disconfirmatory evidence. This account of distorted information processing has the potential to explain both the instability (of affect, self-image, and interpersonal relationships) and the rigidity (of beliefs about self and others) which is typical of BPD. At the neurobiological level, we propose that enhanced levels of dopamine are associated with the increased integration of negative social feedback, and we also discuss the hypothesis of an impaired inhibitory control of the prefrontal cortex in the processing of negative social information. Our account may provide a new understanding not only of the clinical aspects of BPD, but also a unifying theory of the corresponding neurobiological pathologies. We conclude by outlining some directions for future research on the behavioral, neurobiological, and computational underpinnings of this model, and point to some clinical implications of it.





Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in